Essay #1 Draft 1-2 Activities
Draft 1-2 Peer Response (to be done in-class, do
TWO peer responses, a third counts as extra-credit). Reply to the author’s post in the forum to do
your peer response.
1.
RESTATE what you hear as their thesis.
2.
List what you see as the main supports (main
REASONS). Write them as
Topic/Transition/Linking sentences (like in the examples on the back).
Example: First, I believe Ismene acts morally because she tries to save her
sister.
3.
Look at the use of quotes to build support on the
example paragraph on the back. POINT to
the paragraph in your peer's draft that seems to be building the best support
right now. Why do you think it is strong?
(Can you see three secondary supports using quotes from the text?)
4.
POINT to the paragraph that seems to have the
weakest support. WHY?
5. 5. What questions do you have for the author? What
MORE did you want or need to hear at this point?
Complete ALL peer response by the end of the
day today (if you don't finish in class).
Writer’s Review Draft 1-2
(This
should be done on Tuesday or before class on Wednesday. Do this Writer's Review after you have
completed your own peer response and after you have received some peer
response. (If you don’t get peer response, do it anyway.) Read and consider the peer response you get.
Post it as a REPLY to your own draft.
TOPIC:
Look back at the specific tasks you performed as you wrote draft 1-2. Consider the peer response you have received,
and think about our final draft due on Friday.
What do you consider to be problems or questions you have right now
about your draft? What do you need to do
to answer these problems/questions? What are two of the most important things
you need to do as you revise this essay?
(Length—150
words minimum)
Homework for Wed 2/6:
Complete peer response. Do the Writer's Review. Work on your essay.
Review in your handbook the conventions regarding punctuation (read/skim
through the punctuation section). Look again at the essay requirements
carefully.
Final draft of Essay #1 2/8:
Logic and Argument: Primary and
Secondary Supports
Two examples of Claim + Primary
Supports (reasons)
|
Q: What is a significant theme in
Hamlet? |
Q: Was Haimon acting morally by
opposing his father's policies? |
|
A: (thesis) The most significant
theme in Hamlet is the theme of "seems" vs. "is." |
A: (thesis) Despite all
appearances, Haimon was immoral in his opposition to his father. |
|
PS#1: First, the theme about
honesty emerges over the question of whether Hamlet is truly mourning or
faking it. |
PS#1: First, Haimon's actions
are immoral because Haimon falls from his position of respect for his
father. |
|
PS#2: In addition, we can clearly see the theme of "seem
vs. is" in the early scene where Laertes is leaving for France. |
PS#2: Additional evidence for Haimon's
immorality lies in the selfish motivation behind his actions. |
|
PS#3: Further evidence showing the
theme of "seems" vs. "is" can be seen in the character of
Claudius and his guilt or innocence. |
PS3: Finally, and most
importantly, Haimon acts immorally because his suicide was an immoral
act to punish his father |
Primary Supports need Secondary Supports and
Detailed Evidence
In addition, we can clearly see
the theme of "seem vs. is" in the early scene where Laertes is
leaving for France. The question most
dealt with in the scene is what is the truth regarding Hamlet’s love for
Ophelia—is it true love or is it dishonest love? Laerte’s directly advises his sister not to trust Hamlet’s love: "For Hamlet, and the trifling of his
favor,/ Hold it a fashion, and a toy in blood,/ ... Forward, not permanent,
sweet, not lasting,/ ... No more" (I,iii, 5-9). Hamlet’s love is characterized by Laertes as
not being real love; it is a "trifling," a "fashion," a
"toy," rather than a true love that would be "permanent"
and "lasting." Laertes goes
even deeper into the appearance of Hamlet’s love and works to convince Ophelia
that she is wrong to apprehend it as true:
Perhaps he loves you now, ... but
you must fear,
His greatness weighted, his will
is not his own,
For he himself is subject to his
birth:
He may not as unvalued persons
do,
Carve for himself, for on his
choice depends
The sanctity and health of the
whole state,
And therefore must his choice be
circumscribed
Unto the voice and yielding of
that body
Whereof he is head. (I, iii, 13-23)
Despite
all appearances that Hamlet may love Ophelia, Laertes stresses the fact that he
could never marry Ophelia, making his "love" something that is not
"real"—that is, something that could result in marriage. Further evidence of the theme of "seems
vs. is" can be seen in Ophelia’s father’s questioning of Hamlet’s love as
well. When Ophelia begins to argue with
her father that Hamlet appears to be "tendering" her true affection,
Polonius expresses his doubt:
Ophelia: My Lord he hath
importuned me with love/ In honorable fashion.
Polonius: Ay, fashion
you may call it, go to, go to.
Ophelia: And hath given
countenance to his speech, my lord,/ With almost
all the holy vows of heaven.
Polonius: Ay, springes to catch
woodcocks. ... these blazes daughter,/ ...
you must not take for fire. (I, iii, 110-120)
The key
word that Ophelia uses is "countenance." Hamlet may seem to be in love with Ophelia,
but Polonius considers Hamlet’s outward "showings" of love only to be
"springes," or snares, to seduce Ophelia. As in other places in the play, we can see in
Laertes’ departure scene that the theme of "seems vs. is" is clearly
apparent.