scholarly v. popular articles
| CHARACTERISTICS |
SCHOLARLY
|
POPULAR
|
|---|---|---|
| How can I tell the difference? |
|
|
| Length | Longer articles, providing in-depth analysis of topics |
Shorter articles, providing broader overviews of topics |
| Authorship | Author usually an expert or specialist in the field, name and credentials always provided | Author usually a staff writer or a journalist, name and credentials may be provided |
| Language/Audience | Written in the jargon of the field for scholarly readers (professors, researchers or students) | Written in non-technical language for anyone to understand |
| Format/Structure | Articles usually more structured, may include these sections: abstract, literature review, methodology, results, conclusion, bibliography |
Articles do not necessarily follow a specific format or
structure |
| Special Features | Illustrations that support the text, such as tables of statistics, graphs, maps, or photographs | Illustrations with glossy or color photographs, usually for advertising purposes |
| Editors | Articles usually reviewed and critically evaluated by a
board of experts in the field (refereed) |
Articles are not evaluated by experts in the field, but by editors on staff |
| Credits | A bibliography (works cited) and/or footnotes are always provided to document research thoroughly | A bibliography (works cited) is usually not provided, although names of reports or references may be mentioned in the text |