"Optimism is essential to achievement

and it is also the foundation of courage and true progress."

--Nicholas Murray Butler

 

Minutes

Faculty Senate Meeting

October 31, 2001

Wednesday - 1:00 PM, Science Building Room 208

1. Call to Order

The Faculty Senate President, Dr. Tim Nealon, called the meeting to order at 1:07 p.m.

2. Reading, Correction, and Approval of Minutes

Motion made by Phil Raue to accept the minutes as written, motion seconded by Herman Hauschildt.

3. Treasurer’s Report

Emily Staats, Treasurer, reported there were no new expenditures. Faculty Senator Dee Joseph's expenses for attending the TCCTA Conference have been reimbursed. Access to actual balance was unavailable at print time, but will be included in the next meetings minutes.

4. Old Business

a. Resolution by the Palo Alto College Faculty Senate regarding Faculty Status for Librarians - letter of support written by SPC Faculty Senate.

A letter of support was written and sent to Sandy Hood at PAC. Phil Raue reported that a meeting is scheduled with the Chancellor and Librarian representatives from each of the ACCD Campuses. Phil is to represent SPC.

b. Thank you letters - letters of appreciation written to ACCD Board Members for supporting recent salary increase; thank you letters also written to senators whose terms recently expired.

Van Lopez, SPC Faculty Senate Corresponding Secretary, sent thank you letters to ACCD Board members thanking them for the recent salary increase. Additionally, he sent thank you letters to all faculty senators for their participation on the faculty senate.

c. Retention Issues

Senator Joe Whitson expressed concern regarding students being dropped for having a balance (sometimes of .50 cents) and asked if this issue had been resolved. Tim responded by saying that this issue is currently being addressed.

Senator Emily Staats commented on the constant reminders to increase enrollment and questioned if anyone has looked at a ceiling, a breaking point, or a desired maximum number for student enrollment for St. Philip's. She continued by questioning whether there is a point where St. Philip's will loose its uniqueness of an atmosphere of small classes where students receive close attention from their instructors. An atmosphere that can be lost when enrollment in classes is large and managing student advising, committee work, and other incidentals becomes more challenging for faculty.

d. Follow up on Question & Answer Forum with Dr. Runnels - comments being accepted now for this follow up meeting. Date pending, but tentatively considering the 2nd week in November.

Tim reported that the Q & A Forum with Dr. Runnels will occur on Wednesday, November 7, 2001, at 2:00 p.m. in the Heritage Room. All faculty are encouraged to attend. Dee Joseph shared the questions that have been submitted and commented that unanswered questions from the last forum will be included in this forum.

e. Faculty Senate Goals - tabled before, this item will be discussed along with a report from Dr. Nealon, Faculty Senate President, regarding recent Super Senate Symposium held during the Employee Development Day at SAC.

Tim reported that there was good attendance at the Super Senate meeting during the Employee Development Day Conference at SAC. See attached list (at end of these minutes) for specifics on prioritized goals established by the Super Senate. The faculty senate president's of each campus will work on the goals and recruit help from faculty as needed.

f. Committee Reports

i. Election Committee - status report

Dee Joseph, Committee Chair, reported that the Committee would be meeting soon. She identified a statement in the faculty handbook that calls for the faculty senate to facilitate the development of a Promotion Appeals Committee. She indicated she would be sending a proposed amendment to the Constitution Committee to address this need.

Additionally, Dee indicated the next election of Senators would occur around March of 2002. If you are interested in being a Senator, keep an eye on your email for the request for nominations.

ii. Constitution Committee - status report

Larry Duron, Committee Chair, reported that the Committee's new members are currently reviewing the Constitution in preparation for handling proposed amendments.

iii. Professional Concerns Committee - status report

Herman Hauschildt, Committee Chair, reported that the first meeting of the Committee would be on Thursday, November 8, 2001, at 2:30 p.m. in the conference room of the Applied Science Building. First issue at hand is the anticipated completion of the revision of the Faculty Handbook.

iv. Faculty Development Committee - status report

Lester Hall, Committee Chair, was unable to attend the meeting, but Tim indicated the Committee is hard at work reviewing nominees for the Piper Award. Deadline for dossiers is the 17th of November with a final name being submitted to Dr. Runnels by the 19th of November. Tim also indicated the NISOD Award nominees would be the committee's next task.

5. New Business

a. Faculty Senate President's Report

The following are highlights from meeting's Tim attended.

Cabinet Meeting

Academic Affairs Meeting

b. December Graduation - faculty polled results to be discussed.

As mentioned above December graduations are scheduled for Thursday, December 13, 2001.

6. Electorate to be Heard

Emily Staats brought up for discussion the proposed Distance Learning Policy Guidelines that were distributed via email to SPC All on Monday, October 29, 2001. Of concern to the faculty are issues regarding the untimely release of the draft, class size composition, release time and compensation for course development, as well as the recommended teaching load. Comments were provided to Emily to take back to the Committee that worked on the original policy development.

Dee requested input from Senator's present to complete a report for a Unit Plan Meeting she will be attending this week. She also shared a list of Faculty Senate accomplishments she has compiled over the last year that will be included in the report.

The next Faculty Senate Executive Committee will be on November 14, 2001, at 1:00 p.m. in the Science Building, Room 208.

The next Faculty Senate Meeting will be on November 28, 2001 at the South West Campus location. Future reminders will have specifics as to location, time etc. Keep an eye on your email for this information.

7. Adjournment

The meeting was adjourned at 2:14 p.m.

 

 

 

Submitted by: Larry T. Duron, BSOE, COTA

 

See next page for item # 4 Old Business e. Faculty Senate Goals (Super Senate)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

EMPLOYEE CONFERENCE SESSION:

Faculty Senate Panel Discussion

Oct. 8, 2001

Questions were solicited from audience. Please find a brief summary of

questions and replies below.

SPC: Some plans in the works, Flexibility with students,

Following up on absences, Setting up a financial fund

NVC: No problem - rapid growth currently.

PAC & SAC: Working with students

SPC, SAC, and PAC librarians and counselors are faculty

a. Need to be improved for both staff and faculty

b. Push for an across the board raise

Will be on agenda

All guidelines at all colleges should be the same.

Seven years ago PAC had taskforce made up of faculty senate

members. They were able to review and set policies.

PAC allows faculty to apply in 5th year, but are not tenured

until year 7.

SPC no money set aside

Policy must be set at SPC and will be set

NWV has release time

PAC has release time

PAC requires faculty to have a certificate before developing Web

Courses.

SAC faculty required to take a number of programs through

Technology Center.

SAC faculty given release time to develop course

SAC some grant money available

SAC worried about ownership

states they should be hiring full-time.

SAC Senate Chair does not know.

Policy good, but funding not available.

SAC eliminated spring; mixed feelings on Fall. Make it a teaching

Day or make it a holiday.

PAC mixed feelings on fall. Make it a teaching day or make it a

holiday NWV support for fall.

SPC eliminated spring; mixed feelings on fall. Make it a teaching

day or make it a holiday.

Revisit the decision about fall employee dev. Day.

Percentages of Senators per Faculty

PAC 28 senators; 128 faculty

NWV 51 faculty - no formal senate

SPC 18 senators; 182 faculty

SAC 24 senators; 434 faculty

Question: Adjunct Faculty needs help with student harassment

Reply: Tell Administrators at high school, tell Department chair at

College.

The meeting concluded with prioritizing the list. SPC and NVC presidents identified items listed 1-3 identified by an * as priorities and issues that would be addressed this school year.

PAC and SAC would like us to address all the items and work to

implement them this year.